Argument over West Bank outpost reveals Israel's Cabinet's division
The hardline government of Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has revealed fractures as a result of a dispute
over the demolition of a settlement outpost in the occupied West Bank.
Netanyahu vowed to expand settlements
throughout the West Bank when he came back to power in December and took over
the right-winningest government in Israeli history.
However, a disagreement over ground tactics
was made public last month when Israeli troops crossed into the northern West
Bank on orders from Defense Minister Yoav Gallant to destroy the Or Haim
outpost.
Two far-right members of the Cabinet, Finance
Minister Bezalel Smotrich and Public Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, opposed
its removal even though the state considers such outposts to be illegal.
Law is rule, declared Ben-Gvir, urging the
destruction of illegal Palestinian construction in the majority of the West
Bank, over which Israel has both civil and security control. "There won't
be one law for the Arabs and another for the Jews.
Ben-Gvir is in charge of the border police in
the West Bank, and Smotrich is now in charge of civil affairs in the
Palestinian territories.
According to Netanyahu, settlements must be
"planned in advance with the prime minister and security personnel, which
was not done in this case," in reference to the outpost incident.
Netanyahu backed Gallant in this claim.
The way the Or Haim outpost's demolition was
handled suggests that there may be issues inside the coalition, despite the
fact that it only consisted of a few improvised structures.
According to a senior scholar of the Israel
Democracy Institute Gideon Rahat, the state of Israel is in "very genuine
jeopardy."
When Smotrich said, "It's not normal to
have two officials who have parallel obligations when it comes to the use of
force," he was in the second ministerial position created in the Defense
Ministry.
Smotrich boycotted a Cabinet gathering in
opposition to how the matter was handled.
Two days after the original evacuation,
Israeli forces went back to the Or Haim site to evict Israelis who were trying
to redevelop the land.
Rahat stated, "While it seems like a
minor issue that was resolved, it shouldn't have been there in the first place.
There are several comparable outposts
dispersed throughout the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since the 1967
Six-Day War, so the problem will inevitably come up again.
International law considers all settlements in
occupied land illegal, but Israel makes a distinction between state-approved
settlements, where an estimated 475,000 Israelis live, and wildcat outposts
established without its consent.
Comments
Post a Comment